(4) Completely clear and orderly presentation.(3) Mostly clear and orderly in all parts.(2) Clear in some parts but not overall.(1) Unclear and disorganized throughout.



    (4) Valid premises to support argument(s).(3) Valid premises an weak argument(s).(2) Strong argument(s) with invalid premises.(1) Weak argument(s) and non-valid premises.



    (4) Able to show the weaknesses of the other’s argument(s) and premise(s) offer refinement(s) needed.(3) Able to show the weaknesses of the other’s argument(s) and premise(s), but unable to do refinement(s) needed.(2) Able to show the weaknesses of the other’s argument(s).(1) Able to show the weaknesses of the other’s premise(s).



    (4) All style features were used convincingly(3) Most style features were used convincingly(2) Few style features were used convincingly(1) Very few style features were used, none of them convincingly